Tuesday, April 9, 2013

The Existential Perils of the Grocery Store



I love dreaming about the places I can visit in the future, the food I would like to try, and the experiences I would like to have. I write up long and extensive "must see" and "must do" lists, after hours pouring over travel guides, picture books and websites extolling the praises of certain cities, foods, and experiences. Most of the time I find this a fun activity, but lately, it has become a source of some serious existential frustration. When I look at my finished list, I realize that I'll never even get to experience a fraction of it. What use is it to greatly desire something and know that it will probably be perpetually out of reach? 

At 30, I have experienced more of everything life has to offer than nearly all who have come before me. I have never known true hunger or the true lack of shelter and protection. I have had the pleasure of eating what I want, when I want, in the amounts I want. My possible choices of food are wider than at any time in all of history. I have access to greater amounts and types of food and drink than Kings did less than 100 years ago. A trip to a modern grocery store offers a larger variety of fresh and international food that anyone would have considered an utopian dream just 100 years ago. I recently walked down a freezer section that had nearly 100ft of ice cream choices alone! Hundreds of choices and I can't possible try them all! I find myself wanting more. I find my experiences still lacking something. When will I say I've had as much as I deserve and should stop seeking out more?

This can be said for so many areas of my life. I've seen more movies than most will in their lifetime. I have an extensive music library and I have access to volumes of music throughout history at my fingertips. I have read more books, talked with more experts, and seen more television programs than nearly all my ancestors.  I have traveled to more world locations than most, and I have watched or viewed thousands of movies and pictures that give me a taste of places I will never go to. Yet, I continue to thirst for more.

My 'must go' and 'must do' lists end up being so extensive that I am struck by the reality that I will never get the chance to experience the majority of them, let alone all of them. I could take matters into my own hands and attempt to fulfill these lists, but that would require a conscious and proactive effort where valuable trade-offs are inevitable. At the end of it all, will I finish how I feel now, wanting more?

Making these lists I am amazed at how many experiences of beauty, awe, and pleasure are possible in this world, and available to a middle-class guy like me. This is then equally-matched by the frustrating realization that it's impossible to experience it all. Why would God create a world where only a minimal amount of it and its beauty can be experienced? Why do I feel entitlement to experiencing it all? Is it more entitlement or innate desire for pleasure? Do others feel the same way as I do? Why do I still feel like at the end of it all, even if I could experience it all, I would still be left wanting and unsatisfied? Why can I acknowledge this truth, yet it doesn't alter or change my desires?

Three further realizations when contemplating these questions:

1) Godly Existential Humility: The only way out of complete frustration and despair is through a godly existential humility. Without a realistic understanding of who my creator is, and what I was created for, I think there is call for true despair in the face of our own limited realities. Past generations could not take the full scope of beauty and pleasure available to man because of inherent limitations on their knowledge of the world and availability of free time. These constraints have all but been thrown off in our generation, we can glimpse thousands of available (yet also out of our reach) world experiences in just the click of a mouse button. I must constantly remind myself that I wasn't created as an autonomous, entitled, pleasure-consuming human being, who deserves to accumulate and please himself as seen fit. I was created by God to be in communion with Him, to bring glory to Him, and find fulfillment in Him.

2) Godly Contentment & Passion: The context of a godly existential humility is wide enough to encompass a passive dependence upon God's gracious gifts (take what comes) as well as a pro-active seeking out of our own good passions and desires (seeking out what we enjoy). True humility will be content with the existential choices available and will see them with gratitude as the grace of God. Yet, true humility will also understand that God's creation was given to us to enjoy, and He has designed us to enjoy it (and by proxy, enjoy him through it). This passiveness and pro-activeness taken alone can be abused and misunderstood, but a true contentment and humility towards God will include a healthy measure of both.

3) New Heaven and Earth: My inability to be satisfied, even if I experienced everything I wanted to on this earth seems to be an indicator of the validity of Christianity's claim of a fallen world and a fallen human nature. It pushed me to look beyond this present world and take great hope in the Christian promise of a new heavens and a new earth where the terms "unfulfilled", "wanting", and "unsatisfied" will not apply.


"I said to myself, “Come now, I will test you with pleasure to find out what is good.” But that also proved to be meaningless. “Laughter,” I said, “is madness. And what does pleasure accomplish?” I tried cheering myself with wine, and embracing folly—my mind still guiding me with wisdom. I wanted to see what was good for people to do under the heavens during the few days of their lives.

I undertook great projects: I built houses for myself and planted vineyards. I made gardens and parks and planted all kinds of fruit trees in them. I made reservoirs to water groves of flourishing trees. I bought male and female slaves and had other slaves who were born in my house. I also owned more herds and flocks than anyone in Jerusalem before me. I amassed silver and gold for myself, and the treasure of kings and provinces. I acquired male and female singers, and a harem as well—the delights of a man’s heart. I became greater by far than anyone in Jerusalem before me. In all this my wisdom stayed with me.

I denied myself nothing my eyes desired;
I refused my heart no pleasure.
My heart took delight in all my labor,
and this was the reward for all my toil.
Yet when I surveyed all that my hands had done
and what I had toiled to achieve,
everything was meaningless, a chasing after the wind;
nothing was gained under the sun."
Ecclesiastes 2:1-11

Sunday, March 31, 2013

My Easter Morning Thought Process


I had a lot of strange and crazy thoughts this morning as I prepared for and celebrated Easter. I thought it might be interesting to share a collection of some of the oddest ones I had today. Remember though, they were just thoughts, and just cause I thought it, doesn't mean I endorse it!  

Preparing For Easter Service
[shortly after waking up]

... "It's nice this year not having to deliver Sunday morning papers till 3am, then get up at 7am to begin setting up the church" [I was a minister this time last year]

... "On the 3rd day, Jesus rose from the grave…because he surely didn't want to miss how nicely dressed everyone was going to be at Easter services...that's really not that funny a thought, and it's pretty snarky too...I bet people put a lot of effort into picking their clothes for today...If you spend more time thinking about what clothes you are going to where today than you do actually pondering the reason we celebrate Easter, something is amiss...I think I should post about this to Facebook or Twitter this morning, I think I should mention this to others as well"

..."I don't have any pastel colored clothes, will it be okay to wear brown and white?"
..."I want to wear something formal, but nothing too uncomfortable, I am going to lunch and a movie afterwards"
I ended up having my first smash burger for lunch - It was pretty awesome

[going to Facebook so I can update my status about spending time on clothes]
..."You know, I think I've actually thought more about my clothes this morning than I have about Christ's resurrection. Perhaps I shouldn't post this status after all...I'm kind of a hypocrite about this aren't I?"

..."I really like all the Facebook updates for Easter. So many people posting great statuses about Easter and Christ. This is really encouraging. It shows a lot of unity. I wonder, is this what it felt like for supporters of gay marriage when everyone began changing their profile pic to that equal sign?...I wonder if people who kinda jumped on the marriage equality profile pic bandwagon are now asking themselves, 'How long do I have to keep this up to get credit?'"

..."[I found my thoughts returning to previous Easter moments] I think I really miss spending Easter with my family this year"
During Easter Service
I attended Wheaton Bible Church, a somewhat mega-church with something like 3000 members. It's a long walk from where I parked!

..."[seeing all the volunteer parking attendants, greeters, and ushers] I am so glad I didn't have to organize all of this!"

..."I think I should blog about my thoughts this morning, it's crazy how contradictory they are, like the clothes thing. People will find that funny and interesting"

..."[thinking about my family at Mosaic Church] Even though I had to get up real early, work real hard, and organize a lot, I actually think I miss it. I feel a bit like just being a spectator here. In Tallahassee, I was part of something. I really miss it now"

..."I want to get in touch with those relationships that I haven't really kept in good contact with. If Christ can redeem us and cross the great gulf, then Easter would be a good time for me to try and bring some redemption into lapsed friendships"

..."[the band plays 'Marvelous Light'] Will they sing the 'Lift my hands and spin around' part? No one here is clapping and getting into the song, I bet it will be awkward during that part...[the part comes and the lyrics were changed to 'I lift my hands and sing aloud']...what? They took out spin around?...[they sing, 'sin has lost its power, death has lost its sting']...sin may have lost its power and death its sting, but clearly we are all still under the power of self-consciousness, why isn't anyone clapping? Why am I not clapping? Does my swaying back and forth count as being into it?"


..."[someone's phone rings nearby playing One Direction's 'What Makes You Beautiful'I wonder how many people will hear that and be singing it in their heads for the rest of the service?"

..."[a well made testimony video is shown] This isn't a show or performance, but it's so slickly made and efficient that it feels inauthentic to me. Politicians and corporations put out material this well made and pitched this well. I know their hearts are right and I don't mean to criticize, but this feels all designed"

..."[we sing Matt Maher's 'Christ is Risen] I bet church's all over the country are playing this song right now. Oh, I should post this status later on, it might be funny 'The real winner of Easter - Matt Maher'...wait...that isn't as funny as I thought and it actually doesn't sound right...perhaps I won't post that at all...no, I'll put it in my thoughts blog, that way I can include it without it having to be funny. It will be so meta if I do that!"

..."everyone else in the room can see it, everyone else but you...but when you smile at the ground it ain't hard to tell...DANGIT, now I'm singing it!"

..."[during the main sermon] Wow, there are a lot of people using their phones for the Bible now. There are two people right in front of me using the Bible app...you know, if I didn't bring my Bible and I found myself trying to look over someone's shoulder to read their Bible app I'd feel like much more of a creeper than if they had a regular Bible"

..."I need to make sure I capture this Easter moment with my new Wheaton friends...oh...it would also be a good way to remember what I dressed up in!"



..."[I found my thoughts returning to previous Easter moments] I've come a long way since I wore shorts, a T-shirt, and a ball cap to my first Easter service as a committed Christian back in 2002 at Believers Church in Tallahassee. I'll never forget feeling awkward seeing everyone dressed up. I'll also never forget Justin Boyd [my friend and someone I really looked up to] coming up to me and saying 'Hey man, if I didn't have to be on stage, I'd be in jean shorts and a shirt just like you'. That sure was nice of him"

..."[by the end I realized I should just give in] ...if only you saw what I could see, you'd understand why I need you so desperately..."

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

"Why Do We Do That?"



Why do Christians act the way they act? Ideally, Christians don't behave and act the same as those who don't follow Christ and all the rituals, customs, and behaviors can seem foreign and ridiculous to most outsiders to the faith. Perhaps, the ones it can seem most foreign and ridiculous to are the next generation. I don't personally have children, but in my own experience, I struggled to understand why our family did what it did. How should parents respond when their children bring these questions up? Should they marshal together a list of reasons into a massive tome like Josh McDowell's Evidence that Demands a Verdict? Should parents engage in a direct discussion about the individual practices the child is questioning and provide a proof text to support the action? What would you do?

Although I think how we respond must ultimately be determined in the moment, I was surprised to see such a direct response to this question in the Old Testament book of Deuteronomy. In chapter 6 of Deuteronomy, we find Moses exhorting the Israelite community before their entry into the promised land of Canaan. Moses wants Israel to remember the covenant promises of God, and the Israelite covenant promises to obey and fear him. Central to remembering is passing down the knowledge of the covenant. In verse 20-25 we find this extended discussion on how the Israelites were to answer the future generations that asked why they acted the way they did.
20 “When your son asks you in time to come, ‘What is the meaning of the testimonies and the statutes and the rules that the Lord our God has commanded you?’ 21 then you shall say to your son,‘We were Pharaoh's slaves in Egypt. And the Lord brought us out of Egypt with a mighty hand. 22 And the Lord showed signs and wonders, great and grievous, against Egypt and against Pharaoh and all his household, before our eyes. 23 And he brought us out from there, that he might bring us in and give us the land that he swore to give to our fathers. 24 And the Lord commanded us to do all these statutes, to fear the Lord our God, for our good always, that he might preserve us alive, as we are this day. 25 And it will be righteousness for us, if we are careful to do all this commandment before the Lord our God, as he has commanded us.’
The response of the Israelites is to narrate the story of God. The loving and gracious acts of God are contextualized in history and eventually brought into the life of the questioner. We certainly are not going to lift this passage and share this story with our next generation, the whole New Testament has happened since then! How do we tell the story now that Christ has come? Here is an interesting translation of the above passage in light of the NT by Dr. Daniel Block in his commentary on Deuteronomy:
"When our children ask us in days to come, what is the meaning of the ordinances and customs that we observe, then we will say: "We were slaves to sin, but the Lord rescued us from the kingdom of darkness and ushered us into his glorious kingdom of light, with a strong hand, and great signs and wonders. He has brought us out in fulfillment of his promises and in accordance with his glorious plan of salvation, conceived before the foundation of the world.So the Lord commanded us to demonstrate our fear and love for him by keeping his commands for our good always and as expressions of our covenant relationship with him, as it is this day. And it will be righteousness for us before him if we are careful to show that we love God with all our hearts by doing all that he commanded us. Then we too will hear him say, 'Well done, good and faithful servant. Enter into the joy of your Lord.'"
What do you think about this method of narrating the story of God versus immediately and directly trying to defend our Christian ethics and behavior? Although it might be easier to defend them directly, would you feel competent and knowledgeable enough about the story of God to tell it to the next generation? 

Friday, March 22, 2013

Top 100 Films I Can't Live Without


As I approach my 30th birthday I figured it would be time to revisit my Top 100 films list that I began several years ago and never got around to finishing. A few major changes to the list on this go around:

- Films 100-11 will only be alphabetized and not numbered. As time goes by, it just gets more difficult to find myself ranking these films past a top ten. If I didn't alphabetize, I would never have finished this update. Thanks to Scott Mendelson for the suggestion.
- Films 10-2 will be alphabetized, but separated as part of the Top Ten so they can have a bit of fame.
- The only film with an actual number will be my number one film. 
- No extensive commentary. Sorry, but if I committed to it, I'd never get it done!

I quick word about how I approach my Top 100. As the title suggests, this is not a best films of all-time list or most important films or even my favorite films of all-time. My central idea in the creation of this list is the question, "If I could only live the rest of my life with 100 films, what films would they be?" So in that sense, I guess it is closer to a desert island kind of list.

I choose this kind of list because I find it produces a diverse list of films that doesn't get bogged down in trying to include landmark films (Citizen Kane) I like but don't really love, or in becoming a list of films I watch the most (although that would be a interesting list to make). In the end, I find this method produces the best groupings of films that represent my interests in and love for film. So without further ado, I hope you enjoy it. Feel free to leave your comments and thoughts



FILMS 100-11
(Alphabetical Order)


12 Angry Men (1957)
127 Hours (2010)
Adaptation (2002)
Aladdin (1992)
All the President’s Men (1976)
American Gangster (2007)
The Apartment (1960)
Apollo 13 (1995)
Back to the Future (1985)
A Beautiful Mind (2001)

 

Before Sunrise/Before Sunset (1995/2004)
Braveheart (1995)
The Bourne Supremacy (2004)
Casino Royale (2006)
Cast Away (2000)
Chariots of Fire (1981)
A Christmas Story (1983)
City of God (2003)
Contact (1997)
Crash (2005)


Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (2000)
The Dark Knight (2008)
The Descent (2006)
Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb (1964)
Duck Soup (1933)
The Emperor’s New Groove (2000)
Finding Nemo (2003)
Fist of Legend (1994)
Forrest Gump (1994)
Gladiator (2000)


The Godfather (1972)
Good Will Hunting (1997)
The Gospel of John (2003)
Grave of the Fireflies (1988)
The Great Dictator (1940)
Groundhog Day (1993)
Hard Boiled (1992)
Ip Man (2009)
The Insider (1999)
Jaws (1975)


Jurassic Park (1993)
Kramer vs. Kramer (1979)
Kung Fu Panda (2008)
L.A. Confidential (1997)
The Legend of Drunken Master (1994)
Legendary Weapons of China (1982)
The Lion King (1994)
The Lives of Others (2006)
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001)
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002)


Lost in Translation (2003)
Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (2003)
The Matrix (1999)
Meet the Parents (2000)
Minority Report (2002)
Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975)
My Fair Lady (1964)
Mystic River (2003)
A Night at the Opera (1935)
No Country for Old Men (2007)


Notorious (1946)
Office Space (1999)
Ordinary People (1980)
The Passion of the Christ (2004)
Police Story (1985)
The Prestige (2006)
Project A (1983)
Pulp Fiction (1994)
The Raid: Redemption (2012)
Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)


Rear Window (1954)
Road to Perdition (2002)
Rocky (1976)
Saving Private Ryan (1998)
The Shawshank Redemption (1994)
Sherlock Jr. (1924)
Shrek 2 (2004)
Sideways (2004)
The Silence of the Lambs (1991)
Singin’ in the Rain (1952)


The Sixth Sense (1999)
Stevie (2003)
Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991)
Thirteen Days (2000)
Toy Story 2 (1999)
Unbreakable (2000)
Unforgiven (1992)
Warrior (2011)
Young Frankenstein (1974)
Zodiac (2007)

THE TOP TEN(Alphabetical Order)

Airplane! (1980)
Casablanca (1942)
Die Hard (1988)
It’s a Wonderful Life (1946)
Munich (2005)
Schindler’s List (1993)
Titanic (1997)
Trains, Planes, and Automobiles (1987)
United 93 (2006)

1. The Return of the King (2003)



Stats About the List

By Decade:
-          2010’s: 3
-          2000’s: 40
-          1990’s: 27
-          1980’s: 12
-          1970’s: 7
-          1960’s: 3
-          1950’s: 3
-          1940’s: 4
-          1930’s: 2
-          1920’s: 1

Most Prolific Years:
-          8 Films: 2003
-          7 Films: 2000
-          6 Films: 1994
-          5 Films: 2006, 2004, 1999
-          4 Films: 2002, 1997

GOLDEN AGE: 1999-2007: 41 Films in 9 Years
Most Recent Film: The Raid: Redemption (2012)
Oldest Film: Sherlock Jr. (1924)



New Additions to List in this Update:
-          127 Hours
-          All the President’s Men
-          Chariots of Fire
-          The Gospel of John
-          The Great Dictator
-          Ip Man
-          The Legendary Weapons of China
-          The Lives of Others
-          Project A
-          The Raid: Redemption
-          Sherlock Jr.
-          Thirteen Days
-          Warrior
-          Young Frankenstein


Entires Falling off List:
-          The Bourne Identity
-          The Cocoanuts
-          Empire of the Sun
-          Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
-          Finding Neverland
-          Horse Feathers
-          In America
-          Jerry Maguire
-          Psycho
-          Speed
-          The Sting
-          Toy Story
-          The Truman Show
-          Wallace and Gromit: the Curse of the Were Rabbit
-          Y Tu Mama Tambien


Friday, February 22, 2013

Learning from an Ex-Pastor's Charges Against the Church


While doing some research for a Bible curriculum I am writing, I decided to make a quick survey of introductory Bible videos one can find on Youtube just by typing in something like "Introduction to the Bible". What I found was a strong absence of solidly produced and written Christian introductions to the Bible, but that's another issue. During this search, one of the first videos to appear was a Bible 101 Seminar put on by Houston Atheists and led by Mike Aus. (You can watch the video HERE)

I was intrigued by how an Atheist would present an introduction to the scripture. I watched for 20 minutes and then noticed that another video was available from Mike Aus entitled "A Pastor's Journey to Atheism". I clicked it and watch the majority of it. While I clearly disagree with many of Mike's conclusions and current beliefs (as well as many of his particular arguments about the Scriptures), he shares some fairly damning feelings about his time as a pastor. He says that the dirty little secret of Christianity is that most (he says 98%) of the lay level doesn't even read the Scriptures. He never met a lay Christian who could talk with him about the general narrative thrust of the Bible. 

Mike believes that the Christians he encountered not only didn't read the Bible, but that they truly didn't believe in prayer either. Most of his congregation were mostly solipsistic Christians thinking that God spent the majority of His time carefully crafting the day for each person so that they find the right parking spot, win at chess, or some other helpfulness in their daily activity.

What do you think of these accusations? Do you think there is truth to what Mike thought Christians really believed? I unfortunately think there is a lot of truth to these particular charges and unless the Church addresses these issues, we can look forward to many more videos like this one in the future.

Saturday, February 16, 2013

An Integrated College Curriculum?


   
One of my biggest surprises in attending Wheaton College Graduate School is to discover great divides between many of the different disciplines within the school. For instance, the Bible and Theology department doesn't have much interaction with and overlap with my department, Christian Formation and Ministry. Even within the Bible and Theology department there are great divides between the disciplines, such as between Exegesis and Systematic Theology. These divides have grown over the last 200 years and are not unique to Wheaton, but seem to run throughout the academy as a whole. Individual disciplines have a difficult time speaking to one another and integrating their conclusions and viewpoints.

Should it be that way? Is there something to be gained by this separation? I think it has advantages and disadvantages. I saw this advertisement for Bethlehem College and Seminary that promoted an "Integrated Curriculum" where an even wider range of disciplines (literature, history, theology, etc) are integrated into one course curriculum. Is this an answer to the separation of disciplines or will the combination of disciplines produce something worse than what we currently have? As Piper suggests, is Christ helpful here in proiding us with a way to draw these disciplines together allowing us to see them in not only better light, but the light they were intended to be seen in? What do you think? Have you had experience with
either?



Monday, January 14, 2013

2012 Leaman Awards: Major Awards


I saw only 59 films this year; nearly half of what I typically see in a year. Several years ago I made a decision  to focus less on my side hobby of film and use that time and energy in drawing closer to Christ. I've grown more selective and discerning about the films I watch, but let's be honest, 59 movies is still a lot of movies. What follows are my opinions on what constitutes the best of what 2012 cinema had to offer. My awards are broken into two halves; this first half is comprised of my superlative and technical awards and the second half will feature what I call the major awards. As always, feel free to share your opinion on 2012's best.

Major Awards


Best Animated Feature:
- Brave
- Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted
- Paranorman
Winner: Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted
Runner-up: Paranorman
I didn't see a lot of animated features this year, but based on the few I did watch, I think 2012 was one of the thinnest slates of animated films in memory. Madagascar 3 was a pleasant surprise for me. The film is much more creative and witty than I expected and the 'Afro-Circus' previews portended.

Best Adapted Screenplay:
- Argo
- The Avengers
- The Impossible
- Lincoln
- Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted
Winner: The Avengers
Runner-up: Argo
Here are just a few of the hurdles that any writer of The Avengers would have to tackle: Provide sufficient reason for the assembling of these different superheroes, give room for each major hero to have their own character moments, create reasonable and enjoyable relationships between varied superhero characters, make believable and serious the plot of invading aliens through a portal created by an object called the Tesseract. Joss Whedon not only pulls it off, but the most enjoyable elements of the film (heck, even the Marvel universe) are all a result of Whedon's writing. Whedon brings a successful Hulk to the screen giving him at least 3 stand-out, crowd pleasing, quotable moments (which is 3 more than the two previous Hulk films). Whedon is able to weave Captain America's wholesome values into a modern day setting alongside modern heroes like Tony Stark, without making Captain America a goody-two shoes, "There is only one God ma'am, and I'm pretty sure he doesn't dress like that". Whedon successfully grounds the god-like abilities of Thor and Loki into a believable universe. Whedon creates successful relationships between the heroes, with enough of an emotional arc that by the time they are munching on schwarma in the post credits cookie, we've connected with them as a team. 

Best Original Screenplay:
- The Cabin in the Woods
- Flight
- Looper
- Moonrise Kingdom
- The Raid: Redemption
Winner: Moonrise Kingdom
Runner-up: Flight
A beautiful tale about love between two young kids and the ripple effects it has on the community that surrounds them.

Best Supporting Actress:
- Judi Dench Skyfall
- Sally Field Lincoln
- Anne Hathaway Les Miserables
- Kara Hayward Moonrise Kingdom
- Kelly Reilly Flight
Winner: Anne Hathaway Les Miserables
Runner-up: Kelly Reilly Flight
In all honesty, outside of the Best Actor category, I don't think 2012 was a year of 'great performances'. I found it to be a much stronger year for ensembles and writing than for standout characters. That being said, even in a strong year, Anne Hathaway's performance as Fantine in Les Miserables would deserve merit. Every ounce of her screen time is powerful and moving. Put me down as claiming Hathaway's performance of "I Dreamed a Dream" as not just one of 2012's great moments in film, but an All-Time great moment in film.

Best Supporting Actor:
- Jason Clarke Zero Dark Thirty
- Dwight Henry Beasts of the Southern Wild
- Ewan MacGregor The Impossible
- Seth Rogen Take this Waltz
- Christopher Walken Seven Psychopaths
Winner: Ewan MacGregor The Impossible
Runner-up: Christopher Walken Seven Psychopaths
A great and effective performance in a category filled with several good (but not great) ones.

Best Actress:
- Jessica Chastain Zero Dark Thirty
- Jennifer Lawrence Silver Linings Playbook
- Quvenzhane Wallis Beasts of the Southern Wild
- Nami Watts The Impossible
- Michelle Williams Take this Waltz
Winner: Naomi Watts The Impossible
Runner-up: Quvenzhane Wallis Beasts of the Southern Wild
I hate to say this about any award, but Watts' win here is simply because I couldn't bring myself to giving the win to anyone else nominated. I felt all the performances had their faults, and though Watt's role is a bit one-dimensional, it's still well acted and quite affecting. 

Best Actor:
- Daniel Day-Lewis Lincoln
- Tom Holland The Impossible
- Hugh Jackman Les Miserables
- Liam Neeson The Grey
- Denzel Washington Flight
Winner: Denzel Washington Flight
Runner-up: Daniel Day-Lewis Lincoln
The clear standout of the acting categories this year was Best Actor. While Day-Lewis is great, I think that Washington has given us one of his bravest and most nuanced performances to date. Unlike Day-Lewis whose Lincoln undergoes little change, Denzel gets the opportunity to play a character that gets a true emotional journey. In an unusual turn for Washington, that emotion is primarily expressed through silence, small looks, and facial ticks; it's subtle enough (by Denzel standards), that it can be easily missed.

Best Acting Ensemble:
- The Impossible
- Les Miserables
- Lincoln
- Moonrise Kingdom
- Silver Linings Playbook
Winner: The Impossible
Runner-up: Moonrise Kingdom
I struggled a long time with how I should view The Impossible. When I saw it in theaters  I was moved to tears multiple times, coming close to a full sob in moments. Something about the film touched a raw nerve. Still, just because the film makes me cry doesn't mean its a great film. Was it just manipulation? Beyond the raw emotion, was it a good movie? Honestly, I still don't know the answer. The conclusion I've come to is that I truly appreciate the ability of the film to just be about this family and their struggle to return to each other after the 2004 tsunami wave. Only time will tell if my appreciation and response to the film will wane, but for now, it remains a film that draws you into the raw and emotional situation of being a family split and separated by disaster. Every actor in the film hits the right notes and provides the entryway into that experience.

Best Director:
- Ben Affleck Argo
- Wes Anderson Moonrise Kingdom
- Juan Antonio Bayona The Impossible
- Kathryn Bigelow Zero Dark Thirty
- Gareth Evans The Raid: Redemption
Winner: Gareth Evans The Raid: Redemption
Runner-up: Ben Affleck Argo
Surprised? It wouldn't be the Leaman Awards if it didn't reflect my particular interests and enjoyments, and this year brought us one of the best action films to come along in years! Raid:Redemption was written and directed by Gareth Evans and bears the stamp of a singular vision from beginning to end. Evans doesn't give us a new vision of action (like The Matrix, early John Woo, or 80's Jackie Chan), but what he gives is a perfectly conceived and executed action film. The action is shot, edited, and paced perfectly; providing multiple great action 'moments' and styles within one film. As much as any other film of 2012, The Raid: Redemption is an expertly directed piece of film and an all-time great entry into the action genre.

Best Picture:
- Argo
- The Avengers
- The Impossible
- Les Miserables
- The Raid: Redemption
Winner: The Raid: Redemption
It was hard determining my top five this year, but choosing the number one film was simple. No other film was as enjoyable and as memorable for me as this one. It's an instant action classic and I think over the years will begin to be seen in the same class as Bourne Supremacy, Hard Boiled, and Die Hard. This is a rare find. WARNING: the film and the preview below contains graphic violence.



2012 TOP TEN
10. Chronicle
9. The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey
8. Zero Dark Thirty
7. Flight
6. Moonrise Kingdom
5. Les Miserables
4. The Avengers
3. Argo
2. The Impossible
1. The Raid:Redemption

Overall, I think 2012 was a good year for film. Lots of well-made and enjoyable films provided more (A-) grades to be handed out than has been common the last few years. However, in a bigger way than usual, I feel like my feelings for these films will significantly change over time. With the exception of The Raid, I feel like time will reveal a truer response. Will my visceral and raw reaction to The Impossible fade? Will Argo feel trivial and inconsequential? Will Les Miserables and The Avengers turn out to be fleeting pieces of entertainment, or films that I truly will want to return to over and over? Will Zero Dark Thirty rise in stature as we gain more historical distance, and how will the Hobbit look in the hindsight of the other films? I suppose only time will tell. It just seems that statement is more true of this year than any other recent one.

See Superlatives & Technical Awards

 

The Part-Time Critic Copyright © 2011 -- Template created by O Pregador -- Powered by Blogger